![]() |
![]() ![]() |
DYATLOV-PASS-CONSPIRACY
Look at the following picture from Fifa, who is from the CZECH REPUBLIC.
Fifa was kind enough to share his idea about this tragedy. Fifa has analyzed the photos and think perhaps something was captured lurking in the background in one of the snapshots, perhaps a YETI? Anything is possible?
At first I surmised what is circled is trick of light. However, I could be %100 wrong. The way the group was destroyed, the camp in a shambles, the corpse having broken bodies that are equivalent to what would happen to a human in a high speed car accident, means that normal conclusion do not work with this mystery.
Perhaps Fifa is correct, a YETI, or a smilier like creature is eyeing the group, unbeknownst to the future victims. Do not predators eye their prey before attacking? Yes, they do. Would not a cryptid be as canny as a BIG CAT? Something destroyed this group of skiers. What ever it was, could have been a cryptid or something that could be described as a shape shifter.
DYATLOV-PASS-CONSPIRACY / These snapshots are blowups sent to me from a CZECH who has a theory that a beast or YETI was tracking or spying on the group of adventurers. Note what is in the circled area? Is there something there, caught on film or is it trick of light?
DYATLOV-PASS-CONSPIRACY
/ Was something caught on film, looking at the hardy Russians. This idea could be a zero, as in shadows made out by a viewer to be something that is not there. HOWEVER! One must have an open mind. Animals can be so silent and stealthy Sometimes a predator like a BIG CAT can be on the other side of a tree or glade and one is obvious to it, until it strikes or one sees it moving off. Could not a cryptic or shapeshifter be as quiet as a MOUNTAIN LION? Big Cats know how to blend into the environment, could not a YETI like shapeshifter to animal, be an expert in camouflage?
DYATLOV-PASS-CONSPIRACY / BELOW a lighted in blue snapshot perhaps something looking at the RUSSIANS?
DYALTOV-PASS-CONSPIRACY / ABOVE: a blow up of perhaps something in the trees. BELOW: Photo of what was found in the camera of one of the victims. NAYSAYERS claim this is a far off photo of one of the skiers. Remember, in the diary that was found, amongst the dead, the woman put down on paper, "I KNOW BELIEVE IN SNOWMEN." Does that mean she believed in cryptos or she was talking about the guys she was cross country skiing with?
DYATLOV-PASS-CONSPIRACY / Let us analyze the death scene. Are there clues in what befell the Russians, by what searchers found? I MAINTAIN, a lot of the evidence was not revealed to the public as in what destroyed this group
DYATLOV-PASS-CONSPIRACY
ABOVE THE MAP of the area where the massacre happened.
Nay sayers claim that the hikers were wiped out by a snow slide. Their deaths were the result of being caught out in the cold without proper shelter. Their broken bones, mangled bodies, were due to the impact of the avalanche upon them.
The avalanche surprised the skiers at night while they were in their long tent. The snow slide, hit them so quickly that they had to cut their way out of the tent from the inside and fled from the snow plain. Avalanche over, the group, died from injuries from the slide and from the bitter cold.
Rather thin reasoning in how these experienced pioneers met their death.
If the authorities are correct and I doubt that they are. Why would both ends of the tent be sealed. That is what the Russian honchos who ruled on this tragedy concluded. If they are right, and I say that they are not, what would have sealed the tent? The snow slide?
The official story, the hikers had to cut their way out of the tent by way of the knives they had on them? How can the investigators know that they cut their way out from the inside?
If the powers that ruled on this disaster are correct, did something, as in a YETI or shapeshifter purposely block the exits?
Another idea that concerns the posutalion that the Russians were attacked by a cryptid. Did part of the group get out of the tent, and some were trapped inside, due to the canvas falling on them. The scenario is this, the fight occurred outside the tent and whatever the foe was, had been checked for a minute. One of the outside hikers or a few of them cut into the tent to rescue there sealed in friends, due to the tent collapsing on them?
Here is a big questions, concerning the idea that the cross country skiers were done in by a snow slide.
Why would the group camp in the middle of a snow plain that isangled if they were afraid of an avalanche? Previous pictures of these Russians on this site, show the group making base camp in the trees.
A tent in the trees, or at the edge of a clearing is most advantageous.. The trees act as a wind barrier. Plus, if there was threat of an avalanche, the timbers would be something of a barrier against a wave of snow..
The cross country skiers camped in the middle of a snow plain. WHY? Perhaps the group wanted maximum surveillance against a force or an enemy.
In the middle of a plain, the Russians could see something coming at them. Rather than laying up in the trees and not having clear view as to what is around the camp, as in, sneaking up on the bivouac?
I am adamant, that the on site evidence was purposely lost or not revealed to the public.
Who knows what happened to this group, as in what caused their deaths. I rule out snow slide, due to the fact that their wrecked camp was found, where the RUSSIANS had built it. The camp was not scattered all over the scape.
LOOK AT THE BELOW PHOTOS of the wrecked bivouac. Does that look like an avalanche smashed the lodging area? The poles are still up.
Repeating to a degree, the USSR officials who covered this case, attest that if the avalanche did not get them, the the group thought there was an avalanche headed there way, and the hikers panicked and cut there way out of the tent. The pioneers were confused in the dark, they became lost. The reason some of the dead were discovered, fully clothed and others were not, is because these cross country skiers could not find there way back to their base camp, consequently they froze to death.
DYATLOV-PASS-CONSPIRACY
The following series of photos, concerns the tent, note the cross beam in the snow. The cross support is for keeping the tent upright. In the first photo ,as the gang sets up base camp, you can see the cross pin. In the following photos of the shanty wreckage you can see a cross anchor in background, upright in the snow. Would not an avalanche have taken out the cross support and swept away the standing skis? The idea of the bivouac being hit by an avalanche or the group rabbiting away from the shelter because they were afraid of a snow slide, lacks merit by way of the pictures.
DYATLOV-PASS-CONSPIRACY / BELOW: Different snapshots of the outdoor shelter, it is a big tent with according to record a stove pipe and portable wood fueled heater, inside. This is not Study the photos, the sources have it, there are exits at both ends of the shelter. That makes senes. The story is that the group cut its way out of the tent. Did it collapse on them, what blocked the exits if it it did not fall down. Or was something inside the tent at both ends, that was deadly?
When I first posted info about the DYATLOV mystery I went with the data I could get from RUSSIA. Decades later, I have more info, and here it is.
From the sources ages ago, it was claimed the group had one rifle and that is it. I seriously doubt that tale.
Would a group of adventurers ski deep into the wilds with only one fire arm? NO. NO! NO! These Russians were not stupid people. They would have weapons on them, at least a few fire arms, in case they ran into a wolf pack or an angry bear, etc.
These outdoor enthusiasts were experienced in the ways of the outback. They would not go out into the woods, unprepared.
The next question, what could wipe out so many experienced pioneers in one night? It would be interesting to see the real report, the one that I claim was not released to the publicby the USSR government in 1959.
How many spent rounds were found by the corpses or in the annihilated canvased area? It is very possible, that the weapons were kept by the authorities and any photos of the group with arms were not released.
I frequently go into the wilds of the ROCKY MOUNTAINS or the PECOS TRIANGLE, I never go without some type of firearm. These people are going into an area of Siberia or the URALS that is dangerous in so many ways, surely they had pistols and rifles on them.
![]() |
![]() |
DYATLOV-PASS-CONSPIRACY
A zillion years ago, when I first started writing about this tragedy, data was scarce. Thus the pages on this site from a million years ago concerning DYATLO are dated, so here is the new information.
SOurces from USSR now RUSSIA at first had it, that was only one diary kept by the group, it belonged to one of the slain females. I quesitoned this, on such a great adventure, would not young people keep written record of there time in a winter wonderland. This group was going on a once in life time expedition.
I just found out, that there was more that one diary on this expedition. The number has been bandied about by way of hte sources that thre four to five journals. Did USSR officials in 1959 , conceal the existence of different books, and were pages in these travel notes, not shown to the public? Why would the last days of the these intrepid people, be covered up? The answer tah comes to ming, so the truth or clues would not be revealed in what happened to this group?
BELOW: Photos, that I thought were evidence that there were a nubner of diaries on this safari. I do not think those are napkins on the ladies laps, are they travel notes?
BELOW' THe lady in the near middle looks like she is writing in her diary as the gaggle takes a break. Note the man behind her, what is he looking at. Considering what happened to these people, did he have a premonition or see something that was not right? Interesting snapshot.
Another odd idea, that I rejected was that ages ago, sourrce had it, that the group had only one camera on hand for the expedition. Maybe in the translation, or lost in translation, what was meant, only one camera worked, or that only the film from one camera was salvagable.
I would think that there would be film already shot, kept in a backpakck that could be developed. Did the false translations or bad readings mean that only one roll of film could be developed and all the pictures came from that one camera. I rejected all of those themes. Along with the notion that there was only a solo camera. WHY?
This negating of the offical report is beccuase , in the series of photos BELOW; somebody has to be taking pictures of the person with the camera that is in use.
Plus there are photos taken by a camera man or camera woman that shows a person in the group the picture, has a camera.
One can reason, the account that was released of this catastrophe, not transalted or read correctly. That is possible. It is also possible, information was purposley hidden by the authorites.
WHAT WAS LEFT OUT OF THE REPORT FROM THE LAST CENTURY!
I have now found out by way of new source or sources, in the wreckage of the base camp, a camera on a tripod was found. Was this the camera that captured that odd, energy or light swirl? BELOW: Photos of people on the safari with cameras, on them or using them.
ABOVE: Supposedly the camera that was found around the neck of this poor soul BELOW. Supposedly, in the first accounts of this slaughter from 1959, from this camera on the corpse, came all the snapshots that are in existence.
I doubt that. Again, I think more shot film rolls were found in the debris of the camp. Also a number of the cameras had photos that could and were developed.
What do you think murdered these vacationing, young people? Was it an energy weapon of sound or heat? Was it a shapshifter, an alien or aliens, perhaps a Yeti?